@Lauer
Det er klart at noget af designet er meget ens, når man ser dem side om side. Fra Musk bio. fik Fisker en hård medfart. Det arbejde han havde lavet lignede et æg ? og fra flere steder på nettet fra design miljøet gentager at Fisker ikke kan arbejde selvstændigt, fx:
that designer guy's a theif, he has no imagination, the Artega GT is a Porsche Carrera GT, only smaller, The Lamonta is a DB9 (which he design along with ford's best folk), and the karma is going to be a huge flop because it's so wierd looking
Retsagen som Tesla tabte, gik det på:
On 14 April 2008, Tesla Motors filed a lawsuit against Fisker Automotive, alleging that Henrik Fisker stole Tesla's Model S hybrid technology and is using it to develop the Karma. Tesla's suit claimed that the design work done for the Model S sedan by Fisker Coachbuild was substandard, and that Fisker Automotive diverted its best ideas to the Karma.[81] On 4 November 2008 CNET News reported that Tesla Motors would discontinue its suit after an interim ruling in favor of Fisker et al.[82] A news release on the Fisker Automotive website stated that Tesla was ordered to pay US$1,144,285 in costs.[83]
Det som jeg finder interesant er vigtigheden af at fokuser på det teknologi som man finder rigtig frem for at lave et kompromis. Det er dette klarsyn og fokus som gøre Musk en stærk leder. Han ved hvad der er fysisk bedst og logisk.